OpenClaw Codex

场景库 / Use Cases

3 个重点业务场景(中文 / English)

这页只保留高价值场景:每个场景都提供 KPI、模板入口和文章标题池,直接服务运营内容与落地执行。

This page focuses on three high-impact business use cases. Each includes KPI targets, template entry points, and bilingual article ideas.

重点场景 / Priority Use Cases

先选场景,再拿模板,再写文章。

场景 1:客服与工单自动化 / Customer Support & Ticket Automation

中文:把多通道用户问题统一进一个处理流,先自动分类与建议回复,再决定是否升级人工。

EN: Unify multi-channel support messages into one flow: auto-classify, suggest responses, and escalate to human agents when needed.

KPI(中文 / EN)

  • 一次解决率 FCR / First Contact Resolution
  • 平均首次响应时间 FRT / First Response Time
  • 人工接管率 Human Handoff Rate
  • 工单升级率 Escalation Rate

模板入口 / Template

support_flow:
  ingest: <CHANNEL_EVENT>
  classify: [billing, technical, refund, other]
  respond:
    faq_hit: auto_reply
    faq_miss: draft_reply + human_review
  ticket:
    create_when: [high_risk, negative_sentiment, repeated_issue]
  audit:
    metrics: [fcr, frt, handoff_rate, escalation_rate]

文章标题池 / Article Ideas (ZH + EN)

  • 《把客服消息统一成一个事件流:OpenClaw 实战》 / "How to Normalize Support Messages into One Event Stream with OpenClaw"
  • 《客服自动化的边界:哪些场景必须人工接管》 / "Automation Boundaries: When Human Handoff Is Non-Negotiable"
  • 《从 FRT 到 FCR:客服 KPI 的可观测设计》 / "From FRT to FCR: Designing Observable Support KPIs"

场景 2:社群运营与增长 / Community Operations & Growth

中文:围绕新成员引导、规则提醒、FAQ 回答与风险词处理,降低运营重复劳动。

EN: Automate onboarding, rule reminders, FAQ handling, and risky-content routing to reduce repetitive community operations work.

KPI(中文 / EN)

  • 7 日留存 D7 Retention
  • 问题命中率 FAQ Hit Rate
  • 人工介入次数 Manual Intervention Count
  • 活跃用户比例 Active Member Ratio

模板入口 / Template

community_flow:
  onboarding:
    trigger: member_joined
    action: send_welcome + starter_faq
  moderation:
    detect: [spam, abuse, policy_violation]
    route: [auto_warn, manual_review]
  faq:
    match: semantic_search(<FAQ_INDEX>)
    fallback: human_mention
  analytics:
    metrics: [d7_retention, faq_hit_rate, intervention_count]

文章标题池 / Article Ideas (ZH + EN)

  • 《社群自动化不是机器人刷屏:先做欢迎流与 FAQ》 / "Community Automation Starts with Onboarding and FAQ, Not Spam Bots"
  • 《把社群规则变成可执行路由:误判率如何控制》 / "Turning Community Rules into Executable Routing with Lower False Positives"
  • 《用 D7 留存复盘社群运营流程》 / "Using D7 Retention to Review Community Workflow Quality"

场景 3:告警值班与故障协同 / On-call Alerting & Incident Collaboration

中文:把监控告警先聚合再路由,减少告警风暴;让确认、升级、关闭形成闭环。

EN: Aggregate and route alerts before notifying on-call staff, reducing noise while preserving incident closure workflows.

KPI(中文 / EN)

  • 平均确认时间 MTTA / Mean Time to Acknowledge
  • 平均恢复时间 MTTR / Mean Time to Resolve
  • 每小时告警数 Alerts per Hour
  • 误报率 False Positive Rate

模板入口 / Template

incident_flow:
  ingest: <MONITORING_ALERT>
  dedupe:
    key: [service, fingerprint, severity]
    window: <DEDUP_WINDOW_MINUTES>
  route:
    p1: page_primary_oncall
    p2: notify_channel
  close_loop:
    ack: write_back_status
    resolved: close_ticket + postmortem_stub
  metrics:
    track: [mtta, mttr, alerts_per_hour, false_positive_rate]

文章标题池 / Article Ideas (ZH + EN)

  • 《告警先聚合再通知:值班团队如何降噪》 / "Aggregate Before Notify: Noise Reduction for On-call Teams"
  • 《MTTA/MTTR 不只是运维指标,也是协作质量指标》 / "MTTA/MTTR as Collaboration Quality Metrics, Not Just Ops Metrics"
  • 《从告警到复盘:故障闭环的最小模板》 / "From Alert to Postmortem: A Minimal Incident Closure Template"